One thing I cannot deny is a deep division among our
population, but who is to blame for that? Do we really want to blame one
person? One president? One congress? Many aspects make up this nation, and our
government is only a portion of that. Are we not supposed to be a nation that
believes in personal responsibility? To that end, can we blame one presidential
candidate or another for that division, for what we believe in our hearts and
minds?
I would, instead, think it critical to look to our society
and what has changed within it. The reasons for the increased division are
incredibly complex, and that is largely the problem. Many feel so frustrated in
trying to find a solution that they may turn to the simple answer, even when
the simple answer doesn’t truly provide a solution. What I would look to more
specifically is the change in how we conduct our political discourse, not just
our elected officials, but every one of us.
First of all, there was never a time in this history of this
country where division did not exist, where we did not have incredibly complex
issues with no perfect solutions. However, what we have in 2016 as opposed to
other times in our history are 24-hour news cycles, alternative media, social
media, streaming videos, high speed internet, political talking heads in the
hundreds.
I believe one could write a novel on how these factors have
shaped and changed not only our nation, but the entire world. We have the
entire wealth of human knowledge at our fingertips, the vast problem is that
within that knowledge, are the largest levels of misinformation the world has
ever seen. It’s the (now) old adage: “I
saw it on the internet, so it must be true”. This is a sad side effect from one
of the greatest tools ever seen by both this nation and the world. Fringe
politics used to be exactly that, on the fringe. There were no means of mass
communication for such odd and unconventional political beliefs. And on the
surface, it seems like a great thing that everyone had such powerful means to communicate
ideas; however the way it has been shaped has been tragic. What has come forth
is not a shared forum for thoughts, facts, opinions and beliefs, but rather the
validating and mainstreaming of conspiracy theories. There was a time when
people understood that conspiracies do exist in the world, however they are
rare, and take a small, well controlled group of people to run successfully.
Now, we live in a world where there is an answer to any event or story that does not
specifically fit within your political belief system, that the powers that be
either created the story, or the government rigged the system to benefit the
political candidate you dislike, or that the facts themselves somehow contain
some kind of bias.
I’ll say again, conspiracies exist, they happen at multiple
levels and in multiple ways. The problem, however, is that conspiracy theories
have absolutely no burden of proof. People are so convinced of an absolute
culture of conspiracy that they have a total distrust of any source of
information that does not support their preconceived notions. Confirmation bias
has become so strong that the political discourse, that is critical for
advancement in a society, has broken down at every level. The problem is that
even though this is a country whose population has endless shared values of
loving our friends and families, wanting good schools for our children, wanting
safety and security in our daily lives, etc. is that so many among us are more
concerned whether a person will be voting R or D in the next election.
One of the biggest
contributors to politics of the fringe and conspiracies is the 24 hour news
cycles and all of their offshoots. I cannot stress this enough, the political
news that is being watched, read, commented on, and debated is not news, it is
infotainment. I will evidence this by pointing out one simple fact, productive
policy discussion is boring as hell. Don’t believe me? Look at the ratings of
CSPAN vs Fox News. Almost no one would watch five hours of 24 hour news cycles
a day if it was not entertaining, it’s the simple truth. I will be blunt in
this statement; it is exciting to be angry and fearful. Are these the emotions
or reactions we would actively choose for ourselves? Likely not, and yet here
we are, accepting these emotions daily. It’s not all that dissimilar to any
other program we watch, there is generally a protagonist and an antagonist, and
boy does the antagonist make us angry. Or maybe we’re watching The
Bachelorette, and boy do we hate the obvious jerks on the show, but don’t we
just love to hate them? The problem is, this is the real world, it’s not black
and white, and the solutions take more than an hour or two and a hero with a sexy
hero to solve. The problem is Harrison Ford is not the president. The problem
is that liberals want what is best for this nation, but so do conservatives,
and either side (half of this entire nation) claiming the other is purposefully
and systematically attempting to destroy all we hold dear weakens us all.
Maybe we watch this
infotainment because we feel it’s our patriotic duty or maybe we do it because
we feel we are being informed and derive a certain sense of satisfaction from
that fact. Regardless, at the end of the day what we are viewing is not news,
but specifically designed bias confirmation to keep us afraid, because fear
sells better than sex. The proof is plain to see, profits from Fox in the last
quarter alone were at $1.2 billion dollars.
To this point, I have given a lot of generalized
observations, but few specifics. I will now cover a few hot button issues where
many perceive either unprecedented failure or unprecedented success, when they
reality generally lies somewhere more in the middle. Every single one of these
topics could be discussed at considerable length, but I will attempt to keep
them brief.
POTUS
I do not intend to cover many specifics of the President
of the United States (POTUS) for the last eight years, or the eight preceding,
but rather the change in perception. We all know the president was
never designed to be a king, he or she or even their administration on the
whole was never meant be solely responsible for national security,
health care, energy, foreign policy, crime, education, race relations, social issues,
infrastructure, or the dozens of other issues and realities we face. If it is
not the expectation for the POTUS to ensure all of these aspects run smoothly,
how can we then blame any one individual for the current state of each and
every one of these segments of our society?
I am certainly not implying the
president does not carry a heavy burden of responsibility, but societies shift
constantly for countless reasons, it is important to think critically. I’ve
said for many years the presidential powers have become too expansive,
beginning decades ago, but perception has changed so drastically that any
executive order written is an affront to the constitution, that virtually any
move is a nefarious action, even if there’s long standing precedent of similar
actions. Getting specific, Obama has
issued 242 executive orders as of June 2016, fewer than any two-term
president other than Ulysses S. Grant (see “The number of executive orders by
every U.S. president” http://www.dailydot.com/layer8/number-of-executive-orders-per-president/).
Now maybe some might say it’s not the number, but rather what is in those
orders. I would counter that with asking for some faith in the checks and
balances built within our government, primarily in this case the Supreme Court.
They have, for example, already put a stop to Obama’s immigration efforts (see http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/supreme-court-deadlocks-thwarting-obamas-immigration-actions-224720).
Whether or not one may agree with their decision, what is important is to know
that measures are in place for executive overreach.
To cover every perceived view or conspiracy related to the
current administration would take an entirely separate post, so I will return to generalities.
A president cannot be both feckless and an evil dictator, cannot be both lethargic
and malicious, cannot be both an apathetic Christian and a radical Muslim, and
cannot be both the best President in the history of the United State and the
worst. I have heard the current President described in all of those phrases and
terms over the last eight years. This alone should demonstrate the significant
perception gap to which I speak.
There are 350 million people within
this nation, people of different colors, creeds, religion, sexual orientation,
gender identities, priorities, hope, dreams, goals, careers, monetary status,
and social status. Despite all these differences, it is our share values that
unite us. We love our families, friends, and God. We contribute to society in
small, yet critical ways. We all make
the whole of this country, and most by in large are good people.
Now, more than ever, it is time we
remember we do not elect a king, remember that the whole of a country
is the sum of its parts. It’s time we be personally responsible for our own
actions, and work as hard as we can to improve the areas we feel are corrupt,
damaged, or broken. I am not, however, willing to admit that we cannot fix all
the problems we face, if we face them together.
Immigration
There is a perception that illegal immigration is destroying
this country and violently criminal illegal immigrants are roaming our streets
looking for their next victims. First off, I doubt there are many that would
wish millions would enter this country illegally, however most support
immigration reform and a path to citizenship (see “More Republicans Favor Path
to Citizenship Than Wall” http://www.gallup.com/poll/193817/republicans-favor-path-citizenship-wall.aspx).
What has been pointed out simply, is that illegal immigrants
commit fewer violent crimes than American citizens (see “The Mythical
Connection Between Immigrants and Crime” http://www.wsj.com/articles/the-mythical-connection-between-immigrants-and-crime-1436916798).
Certainly this does not imply that these individuals are not inherently committing
the crime of entering the United States illegally, it simply dispels part of
the dystopian hellscape painted for us by one particular presidential candidate
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lj-XOJsHKsE),
again going back to the perception issues when the reality is far more complex
and requires intelligent debate on how best to proceed.
To address the perception that the current administration
has let the floodgates to open, allowing an unprecedented wave of illegal
immigrants into the United States, the facts simply do not support this hyperbole (see 5 facts about illegal immigration in the U.S. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/11/19/5-facts-about-illegal-immigration-in-the-u-s/
) .
Another point that is important to address, is mass
deportations. Aside from the massive cost to enact such a plan, illegal
immigrants currently make up about 5% of the American workforce. To remove such
a significant portion of the American workforce would create notable negative
economic shifts (see “Trump's Deportation Plan 'Prohibitively Expensive'” http://www.forbes.com/sites/doliaestevez/2015/09/14/trumps-plan-to-round-up-and-deport-11-million-immigrants-within-24-months-prohibitively-expensive/#59520dc2b1ea)
Regarding the refugee crisis and general terrorism, please see
another post if you would like my thoughts on that subject (see “A
Non-Bleeding-heart Case for Syrian Refugees” http://moderatedispatch.blogspot.com/2016/09/this-is-something-i-wrote-shortly-after.html#links)
To recap, attacks from domestic radical
Islamic terrorists are still statistically and incredibly rare in this country, and foreign
radical Islamic terrorist attacks are virtually nonexistent.
PC Culture
What is PC culture? I reject the idea
entirely, because what is politically incorrect to one can easily be correct to
another. Such things can be debated, and should, with civility. The real issue
is over sensitivity. I see it equally between conservatives and liberals; they
simply are sensitive about different topics
From what I can tell, liberals go
overboard with so called "bleeding hearts", and conservatives go
overboard with complaints about "PC Culture". Again, in the days of social media
everything is exaggerated. All you need to do is find 5-10 twitter posts and
you've got a story. Do you think any rational person cares about Starbuck's
Christmas/holiday/winter cups? Do you personally know anyone that was
offended by it? I sure don't.
I no longer see it as PC Culture, what I see are social justice warriors fighting battles on both sides. Put a photo of a family with two dads on a girl's magazine? If you find yourself significantly concerned over something like that you're a conservative social justice warrior. Gays exist and we don't need to hide them from children. If you're mad that there happens to be a benign religious symbol on public land, you're a liberal social justice warrior and you need stop looking for reason to be mad and offended. Religion exists and it doesn't need to be hid from anyone.
And for anyone that talks about "slippery slopes", I guarantee nothing you're complaining about is a sign of a larger problem. There's no sharia law in the US, there is no war on Christianity, and most Christians respectfully keep their faith between them, their family, and their God. No matter how many anecdotal stories one reads on their news source of choice.
The issue is that social justice warriors rarely speak for the majority, because people have lives to live. We need to all calm down and try to regain focus on topics that actually matter.
I no longer see it as PC Culture, what I see are social justice warriors fighting battles on both sides. Put a photo of a family with two dads on a girl's magazine? If you find yourself significantly concerned over something like that you're a conservative social justice warrior. Gays exist and we don't need to hide them from children. If you're mad that there happens to be a benign religious symbol on public land, you're a liberal social justice warrior and you need stop looking for reason to be mad and offended. Religion exists and it doesn't need to be hid from anyone.
And for anyone that talks about "slippery slopes", I guarantee nothing you're complaining about is a sign of a larger problem. There's no sharia law in the US, there is no war on Christianity, and most Christians respectfully keep their faith between them, their family, and their God. No matter how many anecdotal stories one reads on their news source of choice.
The issue is that social justice warriors rarely speak for the majority, because people have lives to live. We need to all calm down and try to regain focus on topics that actually matter.
The Economy
This is too extensive a topic to cover and grade the current
state of the economy. Obviously there are countless measures (GDP,
unemployment, home ownership rates, consumer confidence, stock market, etc). Rather
than try to analyze and grade the complexities of the current US Economy, I will
again go back to issue of perception.
Do we, as asked before, ever want one person or
administration exclusively responsible for our economy? I support the
free market system, as it is the best we have and gives citizens the most
opportunities for success. However, we need to dispel the idea that it is a
perfect system and that the only way a free market system can fail is through government
intervention.
The economy is no longer simply made up of the 350 million
individuals and the incredibly complex economic systems we have in place, we
also now compete in the global market. In the current presidential race many
will say we need to refocus our efforts to our own nation’s goals. While I agree
with that position in theory, the simple fact is that if we do not compete in
the global economy, it will weaken our own economy. If we impose tariffs on
trade partners, that will not magically result in outsources jobs returning to
the US or piles of cash for our own economy.
If I had all of the answers to past, current, and future
economic woes I doubt I would be writing this post, I would more likely be jet
skiing off my private island in the Caymans. I am simply hoping to remind
everyone that our economy is made up of our population, supply and demand, government
regulation, stock market, energy concerns, infrastructure, personal
responsibility, social program, education costs, innovation, international trade,
tax rates, etc etc etc.
Regarding government spending, there's significant amounts of demonization that takes place, but let me remind everyone that Social Security, Medicare/Medicaid, and Defense spending make up two thirds of our entire spending on average. So if we're serious about budget and national debt concerns, we will be forced within the near future to take a hard look at programs that are incredibly unpopular politically to cut.
Gun Control
I'm always torn on this subject, but
what bothers me the most is the view that the mere suggestion of
additional gun control measures is an absolute attack on liberty, or that it's
a conspiracy level gun grab.
We already accept gun control measures, we accept limits on all constitutional freedom with understanding that it's necessary for public safety. We accept that average citizens cannot own fully automatic weapons, tanks, RPGs, fighter jets, land mines, grenades, etc etc etc. The vast majority of citizens would think it's absurd for an average person to own these weapons, so at a minimum, owners of AR-15, Sig MCX, etc. should at least understand why the average citizen does not think they should own a weapon that can kill fifty people in minutes, even if they do not agree with the removal of said weapon.
America has around 4.5% of the world's population, but about a third of its mass shootings. It is hard to deny the correlation of the number of firearms that exist in this country. And gun sales have only skyrocketed after the NRA's absurd claims that the government was planning on removing all firearms from citizens. It should be noted that after Orlando night club shooting, stock in Smith & Wesson went up 8% and in Ruger up 10% the day following the shooting.
As the President said, if we want to accept that in the name of freedom, so be it, but it's clear that the solution is not "more guns" (again, 4.5% population, about 42% of all privately held firearms in the world), or arming teachers, or removing "gun free zones" or whatever other nonsense the NRA is selling in order to continue the increase in gun sales and their inexplicable influence in Washington.
We already accept gun control measures, we accept limits on all constitutional freedom with understanding that it's necessary for public safety. We accept that average citizens cannot own fully automatic weapons, tanks, RPGs, fighter jets, land mines, grenades, etc etc etc. The vast majority of citizens would think it's absurd for an average person to own these weapons, so at a minimum, owners of AR-15, Sig MCX, etc. should at least understand why the average citizen does not think they should own a weapon that can kill fifty people in minutes, even if they do not agree with the removal of said weapon.
America has around 4.5% of the world's population, but about a third of its mass shootings. It is hard to deny the correlation of the number of firearms that exist in this country. And gun sales have only skyrocketed after the NRA's absurd claims that the government was planning on removing all firearms from citizens. It should be noted that after Orlando night club shooting, stock in Smith & Wesson went up 8% and in Ruger up 10% the day following the shooting.
As the President said, if we want to accept that in the name of freedom, so be it, but it's clear that the solution is not "more guns" (again, 4.5% population, about 42% of all privately held firearms in the world), or arming teachers, or removing "gun free zones" or whatever other nonsense the NRA is selling in order to continue the increase in gun sales and their inexplicable influence in Washington.
Personally, I have never been a big
supporter of increasing gun regulations, but I simply hope we can reach a point
where civil debate on the subject is possible once again.
Trump (if this
section will make you mad, please skip, this is end)
Time to get specific. Let me make one thing clear, I will
not be attempting to convince anyone to vote for Hillary Clinton. I will leave
my thoughts on her silent except to say there is no one, third party candidate
or otherwise, for which I look forward to casting my vote this election. However,
I will state unequivocally I believe Trump to be the worst Presidential
candidate to run for office in my lifetime, if not in the history of this great
nation.
I am unlikely to convince anyone that is prepared to vote
for him not to do so, and I could go on at length describing my feelings on the
man. I thought I would instead provide a list of facts, not opinions, about
Trump (please note I left out anything I thought to be remotely debatable as
fact):
- There are 5 living former or current presidents. Trump does not have endorsement from a single one
- Trump mocked a disabled reporter
- Mocked a Vietnam POW
- Said he wanted to loosen libel laws to make it easier to sue reporters
- Trump has filed four company bankruptcies
- He won't release tax returns, first presidential candidate to do so in 30+ years
- Got in a feud with a gold star military family, who's son sacrificed himself saving other
- Promotes a foreign policy that is internationally illegal and are war crimes (torture and killing families of suspected terrorists)
- Promotes a Muslim ban that is most unquestionably unconstitutional
- Claims the NFL sending him a letter asking him to change the debate schedule, NFL denies this claim
- Claims he spoke with a member of the Chicago PD who claimed he could solve the violence and crime within one week, Chicago PD released a statement saying no high ranking members met with Trump
- Said if he wasn't the father of his daughter that perhaps he'd date her
- Claimed to be the only one to able to solve America's issues
- Promoted the wildly unverified claim that Cruz's father was involved in the JFK assassination
- Claimed Putin wouldn't go onto Ukraine, when he already had
- Current CIA director said he'd refuse torture orders
- CIA director under George W. Bush said he doesn't know how he could vote for Trump
- Michael Morell, who served in the CIA for 33 years, under Reagan, Bush, Clinton, W. Bush and Obama said "Donald Trump is not only unqualified for the job, but he may well pose a threat to our national security"
- 50 GOP Security officials issued a statement calling Trump "dangerous" and "would be the most reckless President in American history"
- Hundreds allege Donald Trump failed to pay his bills for contracted work; he has been sued 3500 times.
Despite ALL of this, I will say I do understand wanting to
vote for Trump. I do understand there are millions that feel left behind, that
feel that another establishment candidate is most certainly not the answer, and
that do have the perception that things are getting worse. However, despite these common feelings,
I have no doubt he is not the answer. His promises are either unobtainable, wildly
costly (both from an economic standpoint and a moral one), or attempting to
bring us back to a romanticized view of the past that never really existed on a
grand scale.
I will conclude with this, me addressing perception issues
does not imply that I do not know we have many problems in this nation, however
I will never be convinced they can be solved by a petty, insecure bully, misogynist, grossly unintelligent, dangerously uninformed, hypocritical conspiracy
theorist, egotist, and an incomprehensible liar. We will achieve our goals and
solve problems by remembering we all want what is best, even when we do not
agree on what that is. We will only move forward if it is together, even if
that journey is difficult and imperfect. Again, one man or woman will never define all
of us.
Go America. Go Broncos.
No comments:
Post a Comment